🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court decided on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an larger group of 11 judges. The court also overturned a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had supported the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the most recent turn in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have control of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of the city as a conflict zone, residents have been posting footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of state troops – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, preventing the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under consideration together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and autonomy as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”